Delivery apps are eating Britain’s independent restaurants

              

 

Delivery apps were once seen as a lifeline for restaurants, cafés and takeaways. Increasingly, many independent operators see them as part of the problem. With commissions often taking 25% to 35% of every order, small hospitality businesses are finding themselves busier than ever but making less money. As platforms expand into “super-apps” that combine food, transport, groceries and retail, concerns are growing that customer loyalty is shifting away from local businesses and towards the apps themselves. Industry insiders warn that unless independents regain control of their customers and protect their margins, many could be working harder than ever for little or no profit.

Delivery apps eating the hospitality sector

Delivery apps were supposed to save hospitality. For many small independents, they’ve become one of the biggest threats to survival.

The commissions are high, the margins are thin, and the customer relationship increasingly belongs to the platform, not to the hospitality business. The answer isn’t to ditch the apps entirely. It’s to use them strategically, not emotionally.

High commissions baked into menu prices

Apps typically charge restaurants around 25–35% per order (sometimes more, once marketing “boosts” and VAT are factored in). Most independents don’t have the margin to absorb that, so they raise menu prices on the app to survive. That shows up as food price inflation for consumers. Impacts include:

• Two‑tier pricing and “normalising” higher prices: Many venues now have: in‑house price which is less than collection price which is lower than delivery price. Over time, the higher delivery price becomes what customers think the food “costs”, which drags expectations and in‑venue pricing upwards too.
• Shifting demand from dine‑in to delivery: When a bigger share of revenue comes via apps (on worse margins), restaurants become volume‑busy but profit‑poor. They’re working harder for less, with kitchens stretched and front‑of‑house underused. That fragility is a big part of the current crisis.
• Marketing dependence and “pay to be seen”: Apps control visibility. To appear near the top, restaurants often pay extra for promotions or discounts, effectively buying their own customers back. Those costs either crush margins or get passed on in higher prices.
• Data and bargaining power imbalance: Platforms own the customer relationship, data and discovery. That gives them leverage to set terms, fees and rules. Small operators have almost no negotiating power, so the cost burden sits with them.

This feeds into the wider hospitality crisis with:

• Margin squeeze on already thin businesses Rising energy, wages, rent and food costs + 30% commission = many independents operating on near‑zero or negative profit from app orders.
• Less resilience, more closures When anything else goes wrong, energy spike, rail strikes, bad weather, there’s no buffer. That’s why you see decent, busy‑looking places still going under.
• Commoditisation of food Apps encourage customers to shop by price, speed and rating, not relationship or loyalty. That makes it harder for small venues to differentiate and charge what they need to survive.

Uber’s “super-app” has made things worse

Uber’s push to bundle rides, food, groceries, retail and experiences into one “super‑app” does a few things:

• Concentrates power even further If a single app becomes the default for “everything”, its bargaining power over restaurants increases. That can mean higher fees, tougher terms, and more pressure to discount.
• Deepens customer lock‑in to the platform, not the restaurant Loyalty points, subscriptions (e.g. free delivery), and cross‑promotions keep customers loyal to Uber, not to any particular venue. Restaurants become interchangeable “content” in Uber’s ecosystem.
• Cross‑subsidy and race‑to‑the‑bottom pricing Uber can use profit from one part of the app (e.g. rides) to subsidise aggressive offers in another (e.g. food), training customers to expect cheap, fast delivery, which restaurants ultimately pay for.

The “super-app” model risks exacerbating dependency and margin squeeze for hospitality, especially independents.

You can fightback:

• Keep app prices higher but be transparent in‑store: “It’s cheaper to order direct because we don’t pay 30% commission.”
• Put a QR code on tables, menus and packaging linking to your own ordering page.
• Offer a small perk for direct orders (free drink, free dip, loyalty stamp).

• Cap the number of delivery orders per hour during peak service.
• Use apps for off‑peak and rainy‑day trade, not your prime hours.
• Create dine‑in‑only specials that can’t be delivered.

• Put a flyer in every delivery bag: “Next time, order direct and save.”
• Capture emails in‑venue with a simple “£5 off your next visit” offer.
• Build your own loyalty scheme, even a simple stamp card works.

• Say no to discounts that don’t work for you.
• Only pay for boosts during slow periods, never on Fridays or Saturdays.
• Track which promotions actually convert. Most don’t.

The profit eating delivery apps aren’t going away. The platforms want to be the default for everything, and restaurants become interchangeable “content”. Your defence: make your brand matter more than your listing.

Delivery apps are here to stay, but they should be one channel, not your whole business model.

The venues that survive will:

• use apps for reach, not reliance
• push customers back to direct ordering
• double down on atmosphere, service and community
• create experiences apps can’t replicate
• build loyalty off‑platform
• protect their margins like their life depends on it, because it does

Future impact on the sector

• More consolidation, fewer independents: Chains with scale, bargaining power and centralised operations will cope better. Smaller operators may be pushed into:
  • closing,
  • becoming “ghost kitchens” for brands, or
  • living permanently on wafer‑thin margins.
• Regulation and pushback: We’re likely to see more debate on:
  • caps on commissions,
  • bans on “price parity” clauses,
  • transparency on fees and algorithms,
  • protections for small operators. Some cities and countries are already moving in this direction.
• Re‑valuing the in‑person experience: The venues that survive will double down on what apps can’t replicate:
  • atmosphere,
  • human connection,
  • events,
  • community,
  • “this feels special” moments. That’s where they can charge fairly and build loyalty off‑platform.
• Strategic use of apps, not blind dependence: Savvier operators will treat apps as lead‑generation, not their whole business:
  • higher prices on apps,
  • strong incentives to order direct next time,
  • clear messaging: “it’s cheaper and better for us if you come in or order direct”.

If you are a small business, self employed or freelance -register to get free 24/7 help for your business – @business111com