Lost mines in the Strait of Hormuz: Iran can’t clear the danger it created

           

 

Iran has mined the Strait of Hormuz and, crucially, no longer knows where all the mines are. That is not a minor detail in a distant conflict but the central fact shaping one of the most dangerous choke points in the global economy today, with direct consequences for Britain.

However, congestion is not the real problem. The deeper issue is control, or rather the lack of it. During the early stages of the conflict, Iranian Revolutionary Guard units laid naval mines quickly and without proper tracking, using small boats in what appears to have been a largely uncoordinated effort. Some of those positions were never recorded, while others are likely to have drifted. The result is that Iran does not possess a complete or reliable map of what it placed in the water.

This matters because it changes the nature of the crisis. The issue is not simply whether Iran is willing to clear the Strait; it is that it cannot do so safely without knowing where the mines are located. In practical terms, that leaves one of the world’s most important maritime routes in a state of persistent uncertainty.

Richard Meade, editor-in-chief of Lloyd’s List, described the situation thus: “As of this morning, the Strait of Hormuz remains both open and closed, depending on your position, both geographically and geopolitically. It is, if you like, Schrödinger’s Strait.”” a phrase that neatly captures the uncertainty facing global markets. More than a thousand vessels are already backed up outside the waterway, including large numbers of oil tankers carrying millions of barrels of crude. Even if the situation were stabilised immediately, it would take weeks to clear the backlog.

The measures now being discussed — transit fees, controlled shipping corridors, and IRGC escort systems — should be seen in that context. Rather than representing strength, they appear to be improvised mechanisms designed to manage a hazard that Iran itself created but can no longer fully control. The so-called “Tehran Toll” looks less like leverage and more like a workaround for a self-inflicted problem.

Ceasefire talks between the United States and Iran are under way, but they are taking place against this unstable backdrop. There is no clear, mutually agreed ceasefire framework in the public domain, and that ambiguity is already being used by both sides to shape the narrative. New conditions are being introduced which do not appear to have formed part of any original agreement, adding further uncertainty to an already fragile situation.

For the wider world, and particularly for Britain, the implications are immediate. The Strait of Hormuz carries around a fifth of global oil supply, and any disruption feeds quickly into energy markets. Higher crude prices translate directly into increased costs for petrol and diesel, while also pushing up wholesale gas prices and, by extension, electricity generation costs.

The impact does not stop there. Rising energy costs feed through supply chains, affecting everything from food distribution to manufacturing and logistics. Small businesses, already operating on tight margins, are usually the first to feel the pressure, but households inevitably follow as higher costs are passed on.

This is how a geopolitical problem becomes a domestic economic one.

There is also a longer-term concern. If Iran is able to establish even partial control over the Strait through tolls, routing restrictions or coercive measures, then volatility in energy markets is likely to become more persistent. That would mean a sustained risk premium built into prices, which countries like the United Kingdom, as energy importers, would continue to bear.

The uncomfortable reality is that the Strait of Hormuz is not simply constrained by conflict. It is constrained by uncertainty, and that uncertainty stems from the fact that Iran has created a minefield it cannot fully map or manage.

Historically, the Royal Navy led NATO in mine clearance, a role the United States Navy was content to rely on. That advantage has now eroded, and while both are shifting to autonomous systems, they are not yet ready at this scale. In practical terms, no navy can quickly clear an uncharted minefield in the Strait.

That means disruption is likely to last months. The mines must be found before they can be removed, and that is slow work.

Any attempt to force the Strait open would be a major military operation, not a technical fix.

Until that situation is resolved, instability will remain the defining feature of the Strait, and the economic consequences will continue to be felt far beyond the region — including here in Britain.

Lt Col Stuart Crawford is a defence analyst and former army officer. Sign up for his podcasts and newsletters at www.DefenceReview.uk

 

 

Lt Col Stuart Crawford’s latest book Tank Commander (Hardback) is available now

• http://www.DefenceReview.UK
• @peoplemattertv
• @509298